|
|
|
Visitors |
|
Join Our Social Media Channels For Continuous Updates |
| |
| |
| |
All manuscripts submitted to ARMHS are referred to the Editor-in-Chief, who considers the manuscript's compliance with the journal’s scope, and adherence to guidelines given to authors, and manages the double-blind peer-review process adopted and applied by the journal. Peer review is an essential aspect of a scholarly publishing process. It is used in ARMHS to validate scholarly works, improve the quality of published works and increase research community networking.
Steps in the peer-review process
The Editor-in-Chief makes decisions based on overall assessment and the quality of submitted work, manuscript reviewers, and article editor’s recommendations. Under ARMHS’s policies, the Editor-in-Chief’s decisions are made within two months from the day the manuscript was originally submitted. Authors remain with the manuscript's copyright, while ARMHS will be permitted to distribute the work across different online (scholarly) databases.
ARMHS Publication Process:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------